Buddha Degree College, Gorakhpur

In academic publishing, peer review serves as a critical quality assurance mechanism to uphold the integrity, credibility, and scholarly value of research. When a manuscript is submitted to a peer-reviewed journal such as the Buddha Journal of Social Science and Technology (BJSST), it undergoes a rigorous evaluation by subject-matter experts. These reviewers, often anonymous to ensure impartiality, assess the manuscript for accuracy, originality, relevance, and its overall contribution to the field.

Through this process, peer review not only guarantees high academic standards but also helps authors strengthen their research, address gaps, and enhance the clarity and impact of their work.

All manuscripts are subjected to a double-blind peer review process, where both the authors and reviewers remain anonymous.
Authors will be notified of the editorial decision (accept, minor revision, major revision, or rejection) within 6-8 weeks of submission.
Revised manuscripts must be resubmitted within the time frame provided by the editor.

Peer Review Process at BJSST

Manuscript Submission

Authors submit their manuscripts through the journal’s online submission system for initial consideration.

Initial Editorial Assessment

The editorial team reviews the submission to ensure that it meets the journal’s scope and basic formatting guidelines.

Assignment to Expert Reviewers

Qualified experts in the subject matter are assigned to review the manuscript.

In-depth Peer Review

Reviewers evaluate the manuscript for quality, originality, methodology, and contribution to the field.

Revision and Resubmission

Authors revise the manuscript based on reviewer feedback and resubmit it for final consideration.

Final Editorial Decision

The editorial team makes a final decision and prepares accepted papers for publication.